Inzamam's Wicket

[vareen]

Do u think it was wrong for INDIANS to appeal 4 inzi's wicket on the 1st ODI??

http://www.GlitterMaker.com/created/28120155.gif (http://www.GlitterMaker.com/)

[Oblivion]

welll....i wud say it was right for the indians 2 appeal...

coz it has to be tit for tat...

if u can remember the chennai one dayer...wen sachin collided with shoib akhtar n was given run out.......then they shudnt hav appealed at that time...

if they want to win by hook or crook.??then y shudnt we ?

[ABDUL WASAY]

welll....i wud say it was right for the indians 2 appeal...

coz it has to be tit for tat...

if u can remember the chennai one dayer...wen sachin collided with shoib akhtar n was given run out.......then they shudnt hav appealed at that time...

if they want to win by hook or crook.??then y shudnt we ?
HEy buddy in tht particular case SHOIBI was just seeing da ball i.e he was at da back side of SACHIN but in this case he was just giving some enjoyement as they were heading towards failure or defeat but INDIANs .........n in my comments he was not out.I f i agree u then y he was given out in FAISLABAD, v/s ENG,ICC shud hve to take actions towards UMPIRES as also:cool:

[sweet20]

no i think indiand very much right? how inzy can stop the ball.its unjustice to cricket on his part.he wanted to get more runs.
also i think there shud be a penalty for umpires.