Why dd ?

[vipin.agnihotri]

telecast right of indian matches at india has once again gone to dd just because they have reach all around the country. its disgusting because there quality is always poor. challenger series telecast by zee sport was better than that of dd. while challenger was dometic tournament, yet quality was so good but for international matches its dd once again (poor quality).


plzzz leave dd they suck!!!!

[Pramod]

Hello Vipin,

On what basis you are saying that quality of DD is poor. In the recent days the quality has improved a lot. They are in par with the private operators. And in a place like india i think DD is the right choice.

[vipin.agnihotri]

no pramod, u can rarely see a complete over in dd.

[tommcat]

Hi Pramod & Vipin :)

The Quality of production (match-live) is good only b'cas its being produced by either TWI, Nimbus or other top production units, even after that DD spoils the entire pleasure in viewing a match by chipping in unlimited ads, useless commentators & further more talk shows. Also they dont wait for any replays or match statistics to be shown fully and they directly cut off to show some ads.

DD any day will be the worst channel, simply b'cas they are block headed and will never learn.

I seriously feel ESPN-STAR are the best for sports esp. Cricket, as they combine the packages well... Ten Sports is good but still they dont have very creative analysis as on ESPN-STAR. Zee Sports seemed to be good when they telecasted Afro Asian Cup & the Challenger Series, but the commentators and talk show experts dont have that much impact, Set Max is a masala mix.

>:) Tommcat.

[vipin.agnihotri]

very well said. i agree